television

Girls in glasses can be so hot.

Hot Tina Fey: sexy four-eyes

Hot Tina Fey: sexy four-eyes

I’ve traded in my walk tonight to relive a bit of my distant past:

I found Season Two at the library Saturday and popped in the first disc last night. Funny how something I haven’t thought about for thirty-three years came screaming back at me when the opening credits rolled. Oh, I don’t remember any specific episode at all, but that beginning sequence? DUDE, IT WAS LIKE I WAS SEVEN YEARS OLD AGAIN. I had a huge crush on Shaun Cassidy (yes, that’s right and I’m not embarrassed by it or this simple fact: I owned all of his records) and Pamela Sue Martin (naturally). Parker Stevenson didn’t do a damn thing for me until I was about seventeen or eighteen. By then, I’d outgrown Shaun Cassidy AND Pamela Sue Martin, but watching them now, I can totally get back into that wee-lass-crush I had way back when.

Hopefully I’ll be able to burn through the five discs before Saturday, since I won’t be able to renew the set and I don’t want to pay late fees for it.

Coming up on strange cousin susan will be a post about Nancy Drew, the books, I mean. It’s been in draft form for months now and I haven’t gotten past the post title, but this might serve as its impetus. FUCKYEAHNANCYDREW!!

I was quite a fan of Charlie’s Angels when I was a lass; by the time I caught up with it, the program was in syndication, airing Monday through Friday at 4:00pm. I must have seen the entire run of the program at least two or three times, though the years the show ran seemingly contradict this memory, since it was on primetime from 1976 through 1981. I would have started watching it in 1980 or thereabouts, and I’m quite sure at least the final season wasn’t quite ready for syndication so soon after cancellation. But the actual facts of this are lost now, thirty years on. As with so many things, I prefer the classic Charlie’s Angels over every other permutation of the show. This should not surprise anyone.

Please note the two constants throughout the life of the show: Jaclyn Smith and terrible clothing. Of course, David Doyle was also a constant as Bosley, but not in these pictures.

Jaclyn Smith! Kate Jackson! Farrah Fawcett!

The Jiggle Groundbreakers

Jaclyn Smith! Cheryl Ladd! Kate Jackson!

The Next Generation

Shelley Hack! Jaclyn Smith! Cheryl Ladd!

The Beginning of the End

Tanya Roberts! Jaclyn Smith! Cheryl Ladd!

The Sad, Bitter, Broken End

The headline should read:

The Companion Spreadsheet project

I use a spreadsheet at work that does everything except input the data for my monthly management meetings. Now if I could just figure that part out… It does all sorts of fancy things that I’d love to incorporate into my Companion Spreadsheet, but alas! It was not I who set it up, though I could likely figure out how to bastardize a certain portion of said spreadsheet for my evil fangirl ends.

Do you think I should break it down a) by years only or b) by months? Also, c) by transmission date or d) production date? I’m voting for the b-c combination.

Why do I think these types of things are a good idea?

(cross-posted at catsuits & glitter)

LOLsarah!jane!

23 Aug 10

And from Weth, frequent commenter, cohort in Comic-Con crime, and he who led me down the path of WhoObsession (and all the sub-obsessions that feed off that)…

XD

The Chicken Dance

19 Aug 10

Just a little something I started to teach my girls in girls in May. Cawcaw-caw!

The Religion

17 Aug 10

I just finished The Religion, which is about the 1565 Siege of Malta. It fed my recently-discovered love for history other than strictly the English variety. I didn’t know anything about it prior to reading the book, to be honest and don’t think I know much more now that I’ve finished it. That’s not quite true…I do know a bit more than I did and really, I recognized some of the historical names used in the story. And although I’ve never expected the Spanish Inquisition, I’m familiar with the larger tenents of it.

For all that, the book was quite enjoyable and has, as you may expect, whetted my appetite for more knowledge of the events leading up to it and the event itself. It also garnered a few passages I find quite beautiful, plus one I’d like to send to my BG1 in honor of her beloved lost Oliver. From what I understand, it’s the first in a trilogy and I’m already haunting Amazon and the library for the next installment.

If you’d written a book about the Siege of Malta, would you want a reviewer to have this to say about it?

The Religion is at once brutal and gorgeous, with a vividly detailed historical setting and emotionally complex characters. By the time you finish, you will feel as though you’ve lived through the siege of Malta!

–Jacqueline Carey, author of the Kushiel’s Legacy series

I don’t know about you, but that last bit in the review might give one reason for pause; is she saying the book is so tremendously accurate that it’s like the reader is RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ACTION or is she saying something else, something not so complimentary? Of course it’s the former, based on what precedes the statement, but still. I’m just sayin’.

On my reading list now is I, Claudius, which I am enjoying as much as I would. And I’d really like to pop in The Romans, that old William Hartnell second season Doctor Who serial, but my computer is being used as a crack pipe for Arrested Development, which I’ve decided is just that. CRACK.

So is The IT Crowd, for that matter.

  • categories

  • archives